<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Churchpunk - Latest Comments in Farewell Nancy Zimpher</title><link>http://churchpunk.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://churchpunk.disqus.com/farewell_nancy_zimpher/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:03:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Farewell Nancy Zimpher</title><link>http://www.churchpunk.com/?p=759#comment-6231552</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is true.  The Master Plan was laid out long before we were there.  I think she was very good at marketing the university though.  I saw more positive ads on tv and billboards after she showed up.  I still think she wanted to make us like an Ivy League school, but it just would not fit the character of Clifton.  Thanks for the comment.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">churchpunk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:03:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Farewell Nancy Zimpher</title><link>http://www.churchpunk.com/?p=759#comment-6209074</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't forget -- nancy may have done some good - but she has also taken credit for a lot of projects that she was NOT the initiator of -- namely UC21 (started before she was there) and the whole "Main Street" thing and a lot of the new buildings -- all that stuff was in the works and i would guess a LOT of it under contract before they even interviewed her.    Yet she has no problem taking all the credit for someone else's work...  thats the biggest problem I have with her.  2nd is her man-handling of the basketball program.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joey</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:41:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>